|
| Home | Intro | Tour(ism) | Montagnards | Society | Culture | Language | Images | Music | Library | Sakun | Links | !! Latest additions !! |
Theme 1. The 'wild man' and dynastic change Several stories tell not of the initial occupation of Sukur but of the arrival of an individual, sometimes a hunter, who becomes integrated into Sukur life and by one means or another takes the chieftaincy from its former owners. Such legends were collected early in the 20th century. Strümpell (1922/23) visited Sukur brieflyin 1906/07 and recorded the story of Watsə, a prince of Borno who emigrated and became chief of Sukur. Meek (1931a I: 312-13) also mentions a man from Borno: |
|
Gudul, Mpsakəli, Cakiri, and variants of these names are all taken to refer to Gudur, 25 km south east of Mokolo, on the eastern edge of the Mandara mountains. Montagnards are usually familiar with at least two of these names and accept that they refer to the same place. But to what precisely the names Mpesakili and Cakiri refer is uncertain, though Gudur is the name of a ritual paramount chieftaincy of which the powerful Bay Gudal was the chief (David and Sterner 2020). |
Meek (1931a I: 312) states that the stranger from Gudur who became chief of Sukur did so through his "wealth and power". Versions obtained by JS and ND in 1992-93, and an earlier one by Shaw, a district officer, indicate that there have been two changes in chiefly kin groups: from Təvwa to Kuləsəgəi and from Kuləsəgəi to Dur, the present chiefly kin group. Shaw (SNP 17/3 25073, 1935: Appendix A: 44-45) describes the first transfer of power from Təvwa to Kuləsəgəi: |
|
The following version, recorded in 1992 from a very old Dur man close to the ruling house, tells of how the Dur took over the chieftaincy from Kuləsəgəi: |
|
|
What are we to make of these stories?
First, we should note that those that connect the Sukur ruling house to
Borno or to the Wandala were only collected in the early years of European
contact when Sukur notables might have seen some political advantage in
presenting themselves as related to the indigenous powers that were then
benefiting from colonial policies of Indirect Rule. Second, it should be
recognized that the story of a "wild man" whether a hunter or
not, arriving with or without a cow and taking over the chieftaincy is not
limited to Sukur but is a historical cliché. Jouaux (1989: 263-64)
describes an almost identical legend from Gudur and comparable ones are
found over a much larger area. According to John Boston (1970), writing
on the Igala of southern Nigeria, the immigrant often represents the importance
of achievement while his marriage to a member of the ruling dynasty emphasizes
the legitimacy of authority gained through descent.
Thus we need not believe the literal truth of the Sukur legends, nor argue whether the Dur took over not only the chieftaincy but also the story from the Kuləsəgəi (or alternatively whether the latter appropriated a story told by those who supplanted them). The corpus of stories is consistent in suggesting that Sukur has seen a succession of chiefly dynasties brought about by outsiders or outside influence. This succession is expressed not only in stories but also in rituals. For example it is the task of Ɗai Kur'ba to bury his 'brother' the Hidi, whom he may not see in life, and Dalatə plays an important role both in initiation and during the Yawal ceremony that celebrates the Hidi and his Dur kin group.
|
|
Not surprisingly another version was related by a Kuləsəgəi man that refers to three Kuləsəgəi brothers. Yet another was told by Depa Buba, the Wula rainmaker or Tluwala: |
|
|
The chief of Wula told us another version
of the story that omitted mention of rainmaker origins but claimed that
the eldest of the three brothers remained to found Wula. Mabas has its own
story and Muduvu another in which the same cliché is used to explain
the differentiation of Wula Mango, Wula Kushiri the home of Tluwala, and
Muduvu itself. The chief of Wula's version does not refer to the kafai and
relates, using the cliché format, uniquely to the relations between
Wula, Sukur and Gulak and to their present day dynasties (as does the Gulak
and one Sukur version). On the other hand, Tluwala's version links Sukur,
Wula and Mabas, but not Gulak, and focuses on powers over water. It is the
Sukur brother who has, and retains the kafai, which gives power over the
Ticini river -- water on the ground -- while the Wula brother, Tluwala's
ancestor, and the Mabas brother keep the səku yam, which relates to rain,
water from the sky. It can hardly be a coincidence that Tluwala is a rain
maker and that Mabas, unlike Sukur, has its own master of the rains. Tluwala's
story would therefore seem to refer to a period preceding the Dur dynasty
of Sukur and its Gulak offshoot, one in which the present chiefly Ka-mazə clan of
Wula was either not present or did not hold the chieftaincy. In this case
the dynasty of Sukur to which the legend refers can only be the Kuləsəgəi.
It is therefore of considerable interest that its senior title-holder, Dalatə,
does indeed have special powers regarding water from the ground, being responsible
for determining where water points and wells should be constructed or dug.
Thus while the corpus of three brothers legends is clearly different from
the "wild man" legends of theme 1, it indirectly reaffirms the dynastic
succession from Kuləsəgəi to Dur that can be inferred from them.
Does, we might ask, Dalatə hold the kafai?
Returning to the meanings of the three brothers legends, we note that, although the chief of Wula on occasion denies it, Sukur is still generally regarded by Gulak, Wula, Mabas and several other communities as "senior". Until recently this was expressed ritually at the installation of their chiefs, on which occasions Hidi sent a delegation that included one of his retainers, Tlagama, to shave their heads, leaving a hairlock into which some of the hair of their predecessor was woven. However every year the chief of Sukur sends gifts via his appointed representatives to the Tluwala in order to obtain rain.
|
Theme 3. Sukur's Gudur origins
As described under the topic Montagnards, Gudur used to be a magico-religious center from which many northern Mandara communities, or elements within them, claim descent, and to which delegations used to be sent in times of trouble to obtain medicines against various natural disasters such as droughts, plagues and other calamities. Like many Kapsiki, Kamwe (Higi), Wula, and Mabas, many Sukur clans claim Gudur origins, and indeed these are invoked in explanation of Sukur's ritual seniority over its neighbors. There are claims to Gudur origins in both Kuləsəgəi and Dur versions of the 'wild man' stories, and there are others that introduce new elements. This one was told in 1992 by an old man of the
Təka section of Dur: |
|
Here there is a
double emphasis, on connecting Sukur to prestigious Gudur, and on the legitimation
of the Dur descent group's chieftaincy on the grounds not of trickery, popular
support, or superior law-giving, but on their being the first comers. This,
once again, is a common African theme (see Kopytoff 1987), and our informant,
undoubtedly familiar with the the "wild man" story, apparently saw no conflict
between it and his own. Fula and Dəvə are in other tales described as giants
who brought two megaliths to Sukur that they had removed from one of the
volcanic plugs in Kapsiki country (though the geology is wrong!) to form
the north gate of the Buk enclosure, and who, with shamanic assistance,
built the house of the chief in a single night. The old man's story is also
interesting because it mentions another descent group, the Gadə, and makes
it clear that such groups do not only recruit members through descent but
can also acquire them in other ways.
|
Comments? Email:
|